Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is treated the same as which of the following rhythms?

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a life-threatening cardiac rhythm that requires immediate intervention. The correct choice relating to its treatment aligns with nonperfusion ventricular tachycardia (VT). Both ventricular fibrillation and nonperfusing ventricular tachycardia are critical conditions where the heart is unable to effectively pump blood, leading to inadequate circulation and rapid deterioration if not promptly addressed.

In both cases, the immediate treatment involves defibrillation. For ventricular fibrillation, high-energy shocks are needed to reset the heart’s electrical activity and restore a viable rhythm. Similarly, for nonperfusing ventricular tachycardia, defibrillation is also indicated because the rhythm fails to produce effective cardiac output, similar to VF.

By contrast, asystole represents a lack of electrical activity in the heart, requiring different management strategies such as CPR and medications but not defibrillation. Atrial tachycardia, being a stable rhythm with sufficient cardiac output, does not necessitate the same urgent and aggressive treatment protocols as VF or nonperfusing VT.

Understanding the commonality between VF and nonperfusing VT is crucial for nursing professionals, as it highlights the necessity for rapid response and appropriate life-saving measures in acute cardiac emergencies.